1:42 PM, March 30th, 2012

For decades, the Supreme Court has refused to televise its proceedings, arguing that video cameras would be distracting, encourage grandstanding by justices, and allow snippets of argument to be taken out of context by a voracious news media. 

It doesn’t look like there will be cameras in the Supreme Court any time soon. Which is good if you like the drawings I guess. 

  1. marisardm said: We have cameras here in Canada at our Supreme Court. And we’re doing just fine thank you very much.
  2. situationsare said: Maybe if the artists made the drawings very unflattering, the justices will grant cameras. Bring in some caricature artists from NYC!
  3. cheatsheet posted this
A speedy, smart summary of news and must-reads from across the web and around the Tumblrverse, brought to you by The Daily Beast.