DAILY BEAST TUMBLRS
1:37 PM, August 2nd, 2012
motherjones:

ilovecharts:

Super misleading chart from Fox News. A 4.6% increase looks astronomical but is miniscule compared to historical levels
-chaddyr23
This is why I love you guys.

motherjones:

ilovecharts:

Super misleading chart from Fox News. A 4.6% increase looks astronomical but is miniscule compared to historical levels

-chaddyr23

This is why I love you guys.

Reblogged from Really, Fox News?
  1. flairey reblogged this from ilovecharts
  2. asynonymforgreatness reblogged this from ilovecharts
  3. hoodiecap reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  4. superterrifichappyfuntime reblogged this from itselzoido
  5. itselzoido reblogged this from pearly-sweetcake
  6. cwgraham reblogged this from ilovecharts
  7. pearly-sweetcake reblogged this from the-cumming-insurrection
  8. librophilia reblogged this from porcelain-horse-horselain and added:
    AHAHAHAHA THE ‘Y’-AXIS GOES BY TWOS. TWOS!
  9. porcelain-horse-horselain reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  10. whinesandspirits reblogged this from pattilahell
  11. trulybadtiming reblogged this from dion-thesocialist
  12. eiloj reblogged this from silversnaffle and added:
    I hate when Fox “fox” me over.
  13. ravenclaws-wit reblogged this from hukaria and added:
    This is the most misleading way to make a graph. Also, it won’t affect like 90% of voters.
  14. hooraybooze reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    I swear…
  15. hukaria reblogged this from ilovecharts
  16. thetruthsiren reblogged this from reallyfoxnews and added:
    FOX News always does this, their graphs don’t start from 0 as they should, and so it ends up being deceptive and...
  17. therealsabolish reblogged this from ilovecharts
  18. eterunizu reblogged this from reallyfoxnews
  19. randommanrunning reblogged this from ilovecharts
  20. sleepydragon26 reblogged this from motherjones
  21. sameoldantics reblogged this from reallyfoxnews and added:
    BLOW ME FOX
  22. anotherdeadredshirt reblogged this from cheeruppirate
  23. starsallhavenames reblogged this from motherjones and added:
    Well I mean yes if you conveniently start your chart at 34 and then increase the intervals by 2 and only cover 34-42,...
  24. morelikegazoinksbo reblogged this from cheatsheet and added:
    are fucking kidding me? this is ridiculous.
  25. craigmac1989 reblogged this from ilovecharts and added:
    A little better
  26. greenvolcano reblogged this from ilovecharts
  27. whatqsees reblogged this from blackivycarter
  28. blackivycarter reblogged this from obama2016
  29. obama2016 reblogged this from motherjones
  30. hedgeworth reblogged this from zombiesaresuchaturnon and added:
    This is such a ridiculous graph. You can’t start a graph at 34. That’s idiotic. I mean even for FOX that’s idiotic.
A speedy, smart summary of news and must-reads from across the web and around the Tumblrverse, brought to you by The Daily Beast.


Networks