NEWSBEAST TUMBLRS

1:37 PM, March 26th, 2013
So there isn’t a lot of data about its effect. And it may turn out to be a—a good thing; it may turn out not to be a good thing, as the supporters of Proposition 8 apparently believe.
But you want us to step in and render a decision based on an assessment of the effects of this institution which is newer than cell phones or the Internet? I mean we — we are not — we do not have the ability to see the future.
4:30 PM, July 9th, 2012
One day in the spring of 1989, Barack Obama and I found ourselves discussing a case whose relevance to the Supreme Court’s 2012 health-care decision neither of us could conceivably have anticipated at the time. I had recently hired Barack—I’ll call him that here because that’s what I called him then—as my principal research assistant, and he was helping me with a complicated law-review article about what lawyers can learn from modern physics. I can still recall him sitting on the floor of my law-school office on that particular day, a lanky kid in jeans and leather jacket, the sun streaming in through my windows, as we went back and forth discussing a Supreme Court decision that had been handed down several months earlier.
10:37 AM, June 28th, 2012

SCOTUS Blog’s Amy Howe Explains Ruling in Plain English

Take a breath and read this slowly. It helped us. 

In Plain English: The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding. On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn’t comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding.

(via SCOTUSblog)

10:12 AM, June 28th, 2012
The individual mandate survives as a tax.

SCOTUSblog, on the Health Care decision. More as we get it. (via shortformblog)

CNN originally reported that it was struck down, and they were wrong. 

SCOTUSblog: “So the mandate is constitutional. Chief Justice Roberts joins the left of the Court.”

Reblogged from ShortFormBlog
9:53 AM, June 28th, 2012

Annndd we’re live! Our panelists are making their predictions now. Have a question for them? You can leave them here and we’ll pass them on. 

12:35 PM, June 26th, 2012
I had the top bunk and would roll down on early mornings and notice the picture of his child on the dresser. You don’t sleep well knowing your child will never know you as a free man.
12:54 PM, April 6th, 2012
The Supreme Court can legitimately return Obamacare?” asks a headline on the French news site 9 POK . The article slowly walks through the legal rationale behind the court’s right to wipe away Congress’s legislation. “Sans précédent, extraordinaires” reads the article. In the German edition of The Financial Times, Sabine Muscat is astonished at Justice Antonin Scalia’s argument that if the government can mandate insurance, it can also require people to eat broccoli. “Absurder Vergleich” reads the article’s kicker, which in English translates to, “Absurd Comparison.” In trying to defeat the bill, Muscat writes, Scalia is making a “strange analogy [to] vegetables.
1:06 PM, March 28th, 2012
Going into the hearings I was very confident . Now I am less so. Almost all experts have said this was a very clear legal call in favor of the mandate, but the conesrvative justices appear to be taking a very liberaterian stand in their questioning. I still think it will pass muster, but 5-4 at best.
MIT economist and Affordable Care Act architect Jonathan Gruber is live chatting with us right now. Come ask questions! 
12:05 PM, March 28th, 2012

Do you have a question about the Supreme Court & the fate of Obama’s Health-care Act?

newsweek:

We’ve got MIT economist Jonathan Gruber stopping by for a live chat on the site today at 1 pm ET. He’s the guy who helped Mitt Romney draft Romneycare in Massachusetts, so should be a pretty good opportunity to figure out what the heck has been going on at the high court these last two days. Chat here at 1pm ET.

Excited! Here’s some pre-reading for your lunch hour: Jonathan Cohn’s story of how the legislation was passed, which cites Gruber. 

Reblogged from Newsweek
3:19 PM, March 27th, 2012

MIT economist Jonathan Gruber wrote a graphic novel to explain Obamacare. In light of today’s SCOTUS arguments, read his defense of ACA on the Beast

1:42 PM, March 27th, 2012
This was a train wreck for the Obama administration…This law looks like it’s going to be struck down. I’m telling you, all of the predictions including mine that the justices would not have a problem with this law were wrong… if I had to bet today I would bet that this court is going to strike down the individual mandate.

CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin on the way the wind seems to be blowing during the Supreme Court hearings. (via tpmmedia)

Why this might not be bad for Obama and his reelection bid

Reblogged from Talking Points Memo
Loading tweets...

@thedailybeast

A speedy, smart summary of news and must-reads from across the web and around the Tumblrverse, brought to you by The Daily Beast.

Find our sister Newsweek Tumblr here.